CME in Practice: Evaluating Commercial Bias

With increasing concern about the issue of independence in CME, providers face continued pressure to demonstrate compliance with the Accreditation Council for CME's Standards for Commercial Support 1, 2, and 6 (independence, resolution of conflicts of interest, and disclosure). While there is no official definition of commercial bias, providers might want to consider developing their own criteria for assessing and preventing commercial bias in CME activities.

Merriam-Webster defines bias as “an inclination of temperament or outlook; especially a personal and sometimes unreasoned judgment and systematic error introduced into sampling or testing by selecting or encouraging one outcome or answer over others.” It is reasonable to assume that the definition of commercial bias would fall along the same lines.

Dig Deeper

Most providers have a basic tool (usually an evaluation form) that asks participants if they feel that an activity was biased. How many providers, however, ask the important follow-up question: If participants feel that there was bias, what factors do they believe contributed to the bias? Without that answer, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to validate these participant-reported bias claims. Since ACCME has not quantified what, if any, levels of bias in CME activities are acceptable, providers should determine their own criteria to effectively measure bias within their activities. Start by establishing levels of bias, perhaps from strongest to weakest. Examples include:

Patient treatment/management recommendations weren't based on strongest levels of evidence available.

Emphasis was placed on grantor's agent versus competing therapies, and no evidence was provided to support its increased safety and/or efficacy.

Trade names were used for grantor's drug only.

Grantor's “branded” colors were used in activity materials.

Trade names versus generics were used for all therapies discussed.

Activity was funded by industry.

Next, calculate an acceptable level of bias standard (e.g., less than 10 percent); it's rare that any activity will receive 100 percent unbiased reviews, although that is the goal, of course. If an activity exceeds this level, map out a process for validation. Did something in the activity legitimately cause concern, or is further investigation needed to make that determination? Either way, providers should consider strategies to address these issues, including:

Review evaluation forms to ensure that you have participants' contact information for follow-up and bias validation.

If bias is identified, convene an internal steering committee, including medical writers and CME office staff, to re-review the content against the bias complaints.

Request the content be re-reviewed by external, non-conflicted experts against participant complaints. Try using three or more to get a mean average calculation.

Immediately follow up with participants to discuss their complaints in-depth (if participants are willing to do so).

Ultimately, it's up to all of us to ensure that our activities reflect the true spirit of CME: education based on validated physician and patient needs.


Ann C. Lichti is the assistant director of operations at Veritas Institute for Medical Education Inc. in Hasbrouck Heights, N.J. Lichti has worked in continuing education for four years. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not constitute the views of Veritas Institute for Medical Education Inc.

RSS Share

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.


Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

Search 125,000+ Venues

Search Meeting Space

Find Event Venues with Cvent

The Meeting Planning Blog

Face2Face Latest Posts

Sign Up for Our Free E-Newsletters



Meetings Collaborative

Rate your experience with meeting venues and suppliers.

Facility / Hotel

 
Powered by: Meetings Collaborative
Aega Awards

Latest Webinar

Beyond Marketing: What Else Social Media Can Do for Your Meetings
Thursday, May 24 | 2-3 p.m. EST

Most associations know that online social networks can be handy tools to spread the word about their meetings and events. But social media can do so much more than market. Our social media expert will uncover ways you can leverage social media to discover the educational content your members are craving, engage and energize your community, build relationships, and even simplify your meeting processes. Register Now!

VIEW ALL ARCHIVED WEBINARS

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Back to Top

Explore Our Newsletters


Meeting Planner Survival Guide

Whether you're a novice planner or a veteran, this compilation of must-read articles is your meeting planning resource.

Must-See Meeting Files

Visit the MeetingsNet expert-advice site, where we’ve got top meeting pros on camera answering a variety of your questions as well as a collection of educational—and sometimes offbeat—editors’ pick lists — from the top tech tools to the best books for meeting professionals.

Suppliers/
Facilities/CVBs

MeetingsNet makes it easy to find the CVBs, tourist boards, and facilities you need for your next meeting.

Deal Finder

Special offers brought to you by MeetingsNet.

Find A Job

Targeted to all aspects of the hospitality and special events industry.

SMM PORTAL

Your source for Strategic Meetings Management info and intelligence

Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   RSS Feed

Inside Current Issue

May 2012 CMI

May 2012 FIM

April 2012

April 2012 RCM

April 2012

April 2012 AM

MM March 2012

March/April 2012 MM

Browse Back Issues