It's enough to make a patient wonder if doctors can get it right.
It's not just patients who wonder. The National Institutes of Health will sponsor a forum on medical studies next month, featuring prominent scientists from around the country. The punch line of the title: "Why Do We Sometimes Get It Wrong?"
One of the reasons for medical reversals, according to the article, is that "Public attention goes not just to studies that are published in medical journals, where they have been reviewed by other scientists. The media also is reporting on studies at, even though those results are often preliminary." Some, like Dr. Lisa Schwartz, associate professor at Dartmouth Medical School, even accuse meetings of being more about getting ink than peer discussion and review.
This article in The Hindu further explores the topic:
It goes further to say, "Press coverage at this early stage may leave the public with the false impression that the data are in fact mature, the methods valid, and the findings widely accepted. As a consequence, patients may experience undue hope or anxiety or may seek unproved, useless, or even dangerous tests and treatments."
It's all about controlling the message, working with the press to make sure that if a preliminary study comes up with a headline-provoking result, they know to stress that the findings are preliminary and more work needs to be done. The vultures among us may take it and run with it anyway, but responsible journalists are in the business to let people know what's really going on, not that we've discovered a miracle pill that will melt off 50 pounds with no diet or exercise. This article, while aimed at containing bad news, offers some good strategies for dealing with the press.
To comment on this post, click on "comments" below. To receive a weekly update, e-mail Sue.