In attempting to codify our conflict-of-interest vetting policies, we have encountered some situations for which there seems to be no official answer. Under our current policy, there are a few cases that are automatically rejected and a few that are automatically accepted for accreditation on the basis of disclosures and abstracts. For the remainder, we require review of the actual presentation by an officer of the accrediting agency (currently, that's me). I would like to present a few of ...

Register for Complete Access (Valid Email Required)

By registering on MeetingsNet now, you'll not only unlock the Conflict of Interest and Continuing Medical Education, you'll also gain access to exclusive premium content.

Already registered? here.